|
|
BIOFORUM The European Biodiversity Forum |
|
| Project Information | Bibliography | Project Partners | Participants | Workshops and reports | Working Groups | Case Studies |
| Agricultural Landscapes | Conflict management | Grasslands | Forests | Spatial Planning | Uplands | Wetlands |
|
Project Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two new BIOFORUM reports on "Biodiversity conflict management" and "The Ecosystem Approach applied to Spatial Planning" are now ready. If you require a paper copy please contact Juliette Young (j.young@ceh.ac.uk) The paper entitled "Towards sustainable land use: identifying and managing the conflicts between human activities and biodiversity conservation in Europe" was published in the June edition of the Biodiversity and Conservation journal. To access the pdf document please click here. The report for the Bioforum project entitled "Conflicts between human activities and the conservation of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes, grasslands, forests, wetlands and uplands in Europe" can be viewed as a Pdf document by clicking here. The report for the Bioforum project entitled "Conflicts between human activities and the conservation of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes, grasslands, forests, wetlands and uplands in the Acceding and Candidate Countries (ACC) " can be viewed as a Pdf document by clicking here. Please feel free to fill in our questionnaire to help us better understand conflicts between human activities and the conservation of biodiversity in Europe by clicking here.
|
|||
|
The purpose of the BioForum project is to reduce the conflict between the conservation of biodiversity and economic development, particularly within the following thematic areas:
|
|
||
|
Conflicts between human activities and biodiversity conservation are widespread in European ecosystems. The main cause of species decline is habitat fragmentation or habitat loss due to pressures such as land use change. A number of laws and instruments are in place for biodiversity conservation including the Convention on Biological Diversity, the European Biodiversity Strategy, the Birds and Habitat directives and Biodiversity Action Plans that operate on regional, national and European levels. However, these policies can in some cases be the initial causes of conflicts. It
is now becoming obvious that measures taken to reduce the impact have not
traditionally focussed on the conflict. This is often due to the complex and
unique nature of conflicts in terms of temporal and spatial scales, intensity,
origins and range of different stakeholders involved in the conflict. When
looking at conflicts between human impacts and biodiversity conservation on a
scale as big as Europe, the multifaceted conflict nature becomes even more
apparent. In order to address the issue of conflict management on all
geographical and temporal scales, it becomes apparent that conflict resolution
in the long term can only come from a full integration of social, biological and
economic aspects. The
main objective of BioForum is to create a European forum for dialogue between
stakeholders to reduce the conflict between the conservation of biodiversity and
human activities. The BioForum
project is co-funded by the European Union under the Global Change, Climate and
Biodiversity Key Action of the Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development
Programme. The project analyses those conflicts that are most likely to be
having an impact on biodiversity. In the first phase of the project, five
thematic working groups were established (forests, grasslands, uplands,
freshwater habitats and agricultural landscapes) and a series of workshops,
bringing together over 80 participants from 19 European countries, were held to
consider sources of conflict, conflict management and monitoring progress in
managing conflicts in each thematic area. At
these workshops, a number of case studies were
discussed.
The
most serious current pressure on biodiversity in Europe is land use change,
through urbanization,
afforestation and land abandonment coupled with a rapid intensification of
agriculture. An illustrative example of
changes in land-use that have affected biodiversity is the intensification of
European agriculture. The use of fertilisers and biocides, land drainage and
clearance, shifts from traditional small scale to new rotation times and
introduction of new species can all lead to major hydrological and ecological
changes in European ecosystems thus creating conflicts with biodiversity. The
causes of conflicts between the conservation of biodiversity and other human
activities are difficult to identify and the full long-term consequences of such
causes can be practically impossible to quantify or analyse in a systematic way.
In order to progress towards the resolution of these conflicts, it is
essential to consider the social drivers that can lead to conflicts in the first
place or exacerbate the conflict resolution process.
These strong negative perceptions and barriers have the potential to
create or aggravate conflicts between biodiversity and economic development,
leading to the idea of an inclusionary framework with improved communication
between all stakeholders and better awareness of the habitats and context of the
conflicts. A
number of conflict resolution strategies were identified in all European
environments but will differ on all temporal and spatial scales. Depending on
the nature of the conflicts, measures can range from major changes in the
political, legislative and administrative frameworks to local efforts
encouraging stakeholder education and communication or improved local scale
management plans. The
monitoring of the conflict itself and the outcome of the conflict management
process is essential for successful long-term conflict resolution. Social,
economic and ecological monitoring data should be used to check the
effectiveness of chosen management strategies. As well as selecting monitoring
indicators, one has to determine who undertakes the monitoring, who funds the
monitoring and how the information derived from monitoring should be used.
The second phase of the Bioforum project will focus on the management of conflicts at the regional scale, usually involving more than one of the thematic areas discussed previously. It will also consider conflict management in more detail, including a review of the methods currently in use and under development in Europe and their application in situations where conflicts are particularly serious. |
|||
|
|
The main objectives of the BioForum project are:
|
||
|
THEMATIC WORKING GROUPS BioForum operates through seven
Working Groups: |
|||
| Working Group | Working Group coordinators | Contact details |
| Forests | Jari
Niemela
Urmas Tartes |
University
of Helsinki E-Mail:
Jari.Niemela@helsinki.fi
Estonian Agricultural University, Estonia E-mail: tartes@zbi.ee |
| Grasslands | Didier Alard |
University of Rouen, France, E-Mail: Didier.Alard@univ-rouen.fr |
| Agricultural Landscapes |
Klaus Henle
Tiiu Kull |
Centre
for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig,
Germany E-Mail:
Henle@pro.ufz.de
Estonian Agricultural University, Estonia, E-mail: tiiu@zbi.ee |
| Riverine and freshwater habitats | Richard Johnson |
Dept
of Environmental Assessment E-Mail: Richard.Johnson@ma.slu.se |
| Uplands |
Simone Matouch
Kateřina Scharffová |
ARGE, Austria, E-Mail: simone.matouch@a-v-l.at
Charles University, Czech Republic, Scharffova@seznam.cz |
| Strategic Spatial Management | Peter Nowicki |
Fons
vd Heydenstraat 57 |
| Biodiversity Conflict Management | Philip Scott Jones |
University of Wolverhampton, UK, E-Mail: p.s.jones@wlv.ac.uk |
| For further information contact: |
| Project Co-ordinator: Dr Allan D. Watt, E-Mail: adw@ceh.ac.uk |
| European Commission contact: Dr. Martin Sharman, E-Mail: martin.sharman@cec.eu.int |